Three U.S. military personnel testified before the Airland Subcommittee on Armed Forces on Tuesday, discussing the need to modernize the U.S. Defense Forces to keep pace with adversaries such as Russia and China.
Douglas Bush, assistant secretary of the Acquisition Army, Lt. Gen. James Richardson, deputy commander-in-chief of the future United States Army command, and Colonel Christopher Grice, director of G-8 Materials, spoke to lawmakers about additional resources needed to compare opponents on the digital frontier.
They discussed the need to promote military innovation in emerging technological spaces such as artificial intelligence, robotics and cybersecurity, especially within the command for the future of the army. This office oversees modernization projects and laboratories touching on U.S. military operations.
“Both China and Russia are committed to increasing the pace and scope of military exercises by improving their joint combat capabilities,” the joint statement said. “The army’s modernization efforts take these new realities into account as we set capability requirements and develop new concepts.
Witnesses highlighted six priority areas in need of more modernization under the forthcoming 2023 National Defense Authorization Act, including precision long-range fires, next-generation combat vehicles, future vertical lifting, network, air and missile defense. defense and lethality of soldiers.
One of the main needs for modernization of the army is digital overhaul. Richardson explained that the command for the future of the army specializes in developing organizations and requirements in the military industry to monitor the introduction of emerging technologies. He confirmed that part of the budget funding for defense will be aimed at scaling up new interoperable security technologies and architectures within the AFC.
“The AFC is helping to pave the way for a data-oriented army fully integrated into the Joint Data-Oriented Force,” he said. “We are working to fully implement common data standards and joint communication formats in our requirements documents to ensure a systematic approach between the military, the Allied Powers and our allies and partners.
Senators on the committee, including Chairman Sen. Tammy Duckworth, D-Ill., And a member of the rankings, Sen. Cotton, Tom, R-AR, noted that the US military budget has been cut or remained unchanged in funding and public procurement for research and development. Cotton noted in particular that the Biden administration’s budget for the military is neither in line with inflation nor with efforts to modernize adversaries such as China.
“We have a lot of work to do to ensure that the military gets the resources it needs to modernize for the threats we face,” Cotton said.